Anthropic seeks en banc rehearing over Pentagon risk label

The D.C. Circuit majority said it had “no reason to doubt” Anthropic’s “noble intentions” and still upheld the Pentagon’s label of the AI lab as a “supply chain risk.” Anthropic has asked for a rehearing en banc, in front of all active judges of the court.
The majority read “otherwise manipulate” in FASCSA by its dictionary sense: to operate or control something skillfully. The fight began when Anthropic refused to let Claude be used for domestic mass surveillance or fully autonomous weapons.
A Lawfare analysis argues the law’s history, built around Kaspersky, Huawei and ZTE, targets covert compromise of government systems. Judge Karen LeCraft Henderson’s dissent described the conduct at issue as “a contractor’s honest and upfront enforcement” of use restrictions.
Up next
DNI Jay Clayton cites OpenAI bug case in espionage warning
America’s intelligence chief points to the OpenAI bugging case as a sign of AI espionage. The accused engineer faces no espionage charge, only one of intercepting oral communications. How often does your office check meeting rooms for hidden devices?
Related stories
- Claude’s refusals made it a supply chain risk, court rules
- Four AI subscribers sue Anthropic, OpenAI and Google
- Two federal officials, two verdicts on Anthropic
- Authors and publishers fight over settlement shares
- Amodei and Mann named in Sony and Warner music suit
- Pentagon blacklist of Anthropic ruled illegal
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Join the conversation
Sign in to leave a comment. It appears after moderation.

