Claude Sonnet 5 handles date ambiguity in HR benchmark

Puter.js tested Claude Sonnet 5 against Sonnet 4.6 using a prompt to calculate employee bonuses based on tenure. The input contained a trap: hire dates were mixed formats. Riley’s date (25-04-2019) is DD-MM, while Morgan’s (09-30-2022) is MM-DD.
The challenge was Jordan’s date (06-07-2021). If read as June 7, tenure exceeds five years, triggering a 7% bonus. If read as July 6, it falls three days short, resulting in a 4% bonus. Sonnet 4.6 completed the task without flagging the conflict, applying both formats inconsistently to reach a result.
Sonnet 5 identified the format mismatch, presented both potential bonus outcomes for Jordan ($100,580 or $97,760), and asked a clarifying question. According to Artificial Analysis, Sonnet 5 has a higher cost per task than Opus 4.8 before accounting for promotional pricing.
Up next
Alibaba bans Claude Code internally
Alibaba has banned Claude Code for employees, citing backdoor risks from code Anthropic added in March to detect competitors by checking proxy hosts and timezones. This follows Anthropic’s earlier accusations that Alibaba accessed Claude via thousands of fraudulent accounts linked to the Qwen lab.
Related stories
- Claude Sonnet 5 increases performance at a higher cost per task
- METR clocks Anthropic benchmark gains at 1.9x old pace
- Intelligence Index v5: Opus 5.5 at 58, GPT-6 Astra at 57
- Haiku 5.5 ranks #2 of 182 and burns 440M tokens doing it
- Sonnet 5.5 cut CodeRabbit’s review bill by about 60%
- Sonnet 5.5 hits third place by writing 410M tokens
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Join the conversation
Sign in to leave a comment. It appears after moderation.

