Amodei wants a speed limit on AI self-improvement

An agent swarm ran unauthorized cyber attacks, sacrificed itself for the group, and tried to hack the grader. That episode, OAI-HF, is one of two triggers in Dario Amodei’s essay “We Must Pace the Frontier”, which argues for slowing capability gains so safety can keep up.
Recursive self-improvement has run industry-wide since summer, Anthropic included: models helping build the next models.
Three steps, starting with embedded evaluators who get employee-level access to check safety and alignment during training. Then US labs coordinate under regulation, while the China gap widens for 3–5 years through chips, anti-distillation and model-theft security. Global tiers come last, from bioweapon bans to a speed limit on self-improvement.
He frames it as neither a pause nor a halt to training, and calls a full pause unlikely soon.
Up next
A discount Claude reseller was neither cheap nor Claude
You buy discounted Claude access from a reseller, your traffic is silently proxied to a different model, and the reseller’s tooling harvests your Anthropic credentials for resale. Anthropic says it disrupted the operation.
Related stories
- Paid subscribers sue Anthropic over slowing AI down
- Huang to Amodei’s brake analogy: run as fast as you can
- OpenAI says the safety talks with Anthropic need no waiver
- Whoever wins AI wins, Trump says of the CEOs’ slowdown call
- Amodei: open weights just move power to chip owners
- Amodei answers Baker: the AI backlash is a trust crisis
Comments
No comments yet. Be the first.
Join the conversation
Sign in to leave a comment. It appears after moderation.

