Skip to content

Anthropic

Over 80% of Anthropic’s Q3 revenue came from new models

5 min read

Our AI analyst checked this story itself: it ran, measured and compared against the originals. What we checked

Written by an AI model from the linked sources and checked against them by a second model. How we work

All about: Claude models →
Image: thenewstack.io

Anthropic’s S-1, filed on October 26 ahead of a Nasdaq listing under the ticker ANT, says model versions released in the six months to September 30 brought in over 80% of its third-quarter revenue, a figure The New Stack picked out of the filing. If your team reads that as a count of customers who switched to new models, it measures something else: dollars, as a share of total quarterly revenue. And the filing’s customer figures show those dollars spreading out, with about 79% of Q3 revenue coming from customers outside the top five, up from about 64% in Q1 2026.

The filing gives the figure as an example of volatility. Anthropic writes that customer usage is shaped by “the frequency and capability of new model version releases, as well as seasonal trends,” which can make results swing from period to period, and goes on:

For example, model versions released in the six months ended September 30, 2026 accounted for over 80% of our revenue for the three months ended September 30, 2026.

Which releases count

The New Stack counts eight widely available Claude models plus three restricted-access Mythos models shipped between April and September. That tally is the outlet’s own. The S-1 names Mythos Preview in April, Fable 5 reaching general availability alongside Mythos 5 in June, and Mythos 5.1, Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5 in September. Launches from late September had only days to add to the quarter, and revenue per model is not disclosed.

Two of those models went dark for a stretch inside the window. In June the Commerce Department imposed worldwide export restrictions on Fable 5 and Mythos 5, and Anthropic disabled both for every customer, foreign or domestic, re-deploying them after it updated its safeguards. Access to its other models was unaffected.

Opus 5.5 is the one release the filing ties directly to customers moving. Anthropic says it “delivered a significant increase in capability and a lower cost per task compared to previously available models, and many customers have since migrated to it from older models.” The New Stack treats migration as an open question; on Opus 5.5 the company states it outright, though without a number. There is a precedent in the same document: after the Opus 5 launch, quarter-over-quarter revenue growth went from 48% in Q4 2025 to 132% in Q1 2026, and both rates check out against the quarterly table.

Dollars or customers?

The New Stack’s caution is that a small group spending heavily on the newest releases could account for much of that 80%. At the customer level, the filing’s concentration figures point the other way. The top five customers made up about 21% of Q3 revenue, against about 36% in Q1, and roughly 25% across the first nine months of 2026; no single customer passed 10%. Net revenue retention, what existing customers spend now against what they spent a year earlier, stood at about 900% as of September 30. None of these figures is broken down by model, so they narrow the outlet’s point without settling it.

Spending per user does vary widely. In Q3, Claude Enterprise users who did not use Claude Code averaged under $75 a month, while the top 5% of Enterprise users who did use it spent about 20 times that. The New Stack’s version, heaviest Claude Code users against “other enterprise users,” is looser than the groups the filing actually compares.

Does revenue fund the next model?

Anthropic says in the filing that it relies on growing revenue to pay for the research, compute and talent behind more capable models, which then draw more spending. It does not say whether that spending is what sped up its 2026 release pace. And its compute bill does not move with a single quarter’s demand: Anthropic typically buys compute 12 to 18 months before it becomes available, so the expense is “generally fixed in the near term” and rose “as committed compute became available to us rather than in response to in-period demand.” That is the company’s account of how it buys capacity, not something we measured.

The ratio shifted all the same. Compute and infrastructure fell from 251% of revenue in Q1 2025 to 48% in Q2 2026. In Q2, Anthropic spent $5,558 million on compute against $11,555 million in revenue, which works out to the $2.08 of revenue per compute dollar that Fortune reported; by our arithmetic from the same table, it was $0.40 in Q1 2025 and $1.40 in Q1 2026. Q2 2026 was also the only quarter of operating profit among the six in the filing, at $974 million.

Our analysis

What we checked

On October 27 we read the S-1 as filed on October 26, searched it for each figure in this story and recomputed ratios from its unaudited quarterly table.

How we check stories

The 80% figure is in the filing as reported, and its base is total revenue. The $16.8 billion Q3 number usually cited next to it comes from Reuters, which got it from attendees at Anthropic’s October 14 investor meeting. The S-1 itself leaves the Q3 total blank, and its own multiple puts the quarter slightly higher. On either number, Q3 alone brought in more than all of the first half of 2026.

  • The revenue sentence reads “from $197 million for the three months ended December 31, 2024 to $ for the three months ended September 30, 2026,” with the figure left for an amendment.
  • The filing says Q3 2026 revenue was 86 times that Q4 2024 figure. That implies about $16.9 billion, or $16.80 billion to $17.08 billion once rounding in both inputs is allowed for. This is our inference from two rounded numbers, and Reuters’ figure sits at the very bottom of that range.
  • First-half 2026 revenue was $16,286 million, below even the low end of the implied Q3 range.

Anthropic

Anthropic’s S-1 caps SpaceX compute spend at $120.5B

Anthropic’s IPO filing revealed it will spend up to $120.5 billion on SpaceX compute through 2029, but either side can walk away on 90 days’ notice once the 2027 lock-ins end. Would you sign a $120.5B deal either side can exit in 90 days, yes or no?

No comments yet. Be the first.

Join the conversation

Sign in to leave a comment. It appears after moderation.